A reading is not a matter of matching information. Reading stance, structural weighting, the relative weight of each signal, life stage, timing and the question itself all interlock, and the number of possible judgment paths becomes enormous. The difficult part is not finding more information. It is knowing which parts should lead, and which are only background.
The masters do not sit online writing every answer. Decades of real casework have been distilled into the standards DEDAO judges by: what should be admitted as evidence, which conflicts must be left standing, when a call can be made, and when it has to be held back.
One piece of information does not decide an outcome. Confidence rises only when several independent factors point the same way. So DEDAO does not race to produce a conclusion; it works to isolate the factors that actually drive the judgment.